Humanities
Prayers for Healing: Reflecting on America’s Most Common Complementary Therapy
By Morgan Medlock
Published: February / March 2008
In recent years, there has been
much research and writing on the association between religion and health.
Prayer is one of the oldest religious traditions known to mankind and is also
among the many spiritual expressions implicated to have a protective influence
against the physical and mental distress related to disease.1,2,3,4 Although many consider it a subject altogether unscientific, researchers have
systematically investigated the clinical effects of religious faith. Prayer has
been the focus of empirical research on spirituality and healing for nearly two
decades, but controversy over the practicality of such studies and their
relevance to healthcare delivery remains. Nevertheless, it appears that the
scientific community is becoming more open-minded toward non-local, even
intangible, elements of healing, and it is reasonable to expect the mention of
prayer as a treatment modality to increase in the future – if not among
physicians, certainly among patients. The latest study by the National Center
for Health Statistics found that more than 67% of patients pray or receive
prayers for healing, making prayer the most common complementary therapy in
America.5 The purpose of this article is to discuss the methodology of prayer, to
summarize empirical research on the subject, to reflect on what prayer means to
patients, and to address its implications for physicians-in-training.
What is prayer, exactly? Prayer
is most commonly understood to be a conversation between a human being and a
Deity. In their book entitled Prayer, Carol
and Philip Zaleski more eloquently define it as “action that communicates
between human and divine realms…[prayer] entails a multitude of forms and a
multiplicity of aims.”6 Some of the recognized forms of prayer include: intercession (praying for
someone else), meditation, praise, thanksgiving, petition, and even sacrifice.
Prayers for healing may include any assortment of these forms and are sometimes
accompanied by an anointing ritual or laying-on-of-hands by clergymen or other
religious leaders.7,8 Most Christian anointing rituals practiced in the United States are based on
the biblical instruction that one who is sick should call for the elders of the
church, “and let them pray over him, anointing him with oil in the name of the
Lord: and the prayer of faith shall save him that is sick…and if he have
committed sins, they shall be forgiven him.”9
A patient’s choice to pray for
healing is often informed by his religious or spiritual beliefs. The Holy
Bible, which is central to the Christian faith, speaks extensively of God’s
restoring power and gives examples of certain individuals who received healing
at His hand (such as King Hezekiah whose life was extended after he prayed to
God on his deathbed10).
It is a traditional Christian belief that God is a mighty healer, but that His
healing of an individual is not always synonymous with eradication of disease.
In Christianity, spiritual healing of the soul is viewed as paramount to
physical restoration. In Judaism, there is a similar belief in God alone as
healer.11 In addition, some Jewish traditions hold that God is the lone source of both
health and illness. Historically, sickness was regarded as a sign of either
individual or collective punishment, and healing was considered a sign of
individual or collective forgiveness. The focal point of contemporary Jewish
beliefs is the idea that healing is not about alleviating symptoms, but rather
it is about developing courage and a positive identity.12 Two common elements of Jewish healing services are meditation and prayer.
Similar healing strategies are found in Buddhism, Hinduism, and Islam. In
Islam, faith is believed to protect against ill health and allows one to manage
health problems when they do occur (by the will of Allah). The ritual prayer, zikr, is an act of worship and is sometimes used to
promote physical and mental wellness.13
One of the first empirical
studies on prayer was done at the San Francisco General Hospital by Dr.
Randolph C. Byrd.14 In a paper
published in 1988, Dr. Byrd summarized the results of his 10-month study. In a
randomized, double-blind protocol, 393 patients admitted to the coronary care
unit were assigned to either an intercessory prayer (IP) group or a control
group. The IP group received prayer by Christians outside the hospital; the
control group did not. It was found that control patients not receiving any
prayer required ventilatory assistance, antibiotics, and diuretics more frequently
than patients in the IP
group.
In a similar study of adults
recovering from coronary artery bypass graft surgery, information about
post-surgery depression and general distress was gathered from a sample of 151
patients. It was found that 85% of these patients practiced complementary
therapies. Two of these therapies, prayer and exercise, were associated with
better psychological recoveries.15A 2002
study by the University of Texas expanded on the notion that prayer improves
patients’ coping regimens. In this study, prayer activities of 32 patients with
cancer were monitored. Increased prayer activity was associated with decreased
physical responses to cancer. Moreover, prayer (for oneself) was found to
influence a patient’s perception of cancer and lessen some of its psychological
effects.16
However, not every study has
found positive outcomes associated with prayer. In a 2006 investigation
involving cardiac bypass patients, intercessory prayer was found to have no
effect on complication-free recovery, and conversely was associated with a
higher incidence of complications.17 Some point out that the inconsistency of empirical studies on prayer is due to
the fact that God cannot and should not be tested; they believe He is a
supernatural being and His works are scientifically unknowable.
In his theoretical model on
prayer,18 Dr. Jeffrey Levin proposes several possible mechanisms by which prayer evokes
healing. He discusses the possibility that prayer works by naturalistic
mechanisms: perhaps by optimizing the efficacy of a force present within the
universe or strengthening the reign of mind over body. Toward the end of his
proposal, he admits that none of these theories really matter to the one who
prays. For that individual, the only mechanism by which prayer works is a
supernatural one, and the only explanation needed for how prayer heals is the
existence of a transcendent Creator-God, a supernatural Being, who is able to
heal.
The belief in a God who heals has
a profound effect on the physician-patient relationship. For some patients, it
means that the physician is not autonomous, but rather is assisting God, and
may even be an instrument in His hands.19 It means that they trust in God’s will and their clinical decisions are
influenced by that trust. Consequently, there are some patients who desire to
include their physicians in spiritual discussions. Ehman et al. found that 94%
of patients who considered spirituality important wanted physicians to ask
about their spiritual beliefs, and nearly half of those who did not consider
spirituality important still felt physicians should ask.20 Another study found that some patients desire to pray with their physicians but
feel embarrassed to make the request.21 These studies suggest that some patients would benefit from physicians who are
sensitive and responsive to spiritual issues. Traditionally, medical practitioners have avoided
matters of spirituality in the medical interview, but recently, steps have been
taken to address the spiritual needs of patients. The Handbook of Religion
and Health encourages physicians and other
healthcare professionals to consider taking a spiritual history, to cautiously
use spiritual interventions (such as prayer), and to encourage the spiritual
and/or religious beliefs of patients.22 In addition, the Joint
Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) has published
guidelines for taking a spiritual assessment.23 At Mayo Medical School in Rochester, Minnesota, we
have already discussed in our first year how to initiate a conversation with
patients about their religious or spiritual beliefs and how to respond to
patients’ requests to pray. Training on spiritual history taking is being
integrated into medical education nationwide. Nearly two-thirds of medical
schools now incorporate this type of coursework into their curricula.24 The integration of spirituality and medicine
represents a new frontier in health science. It is likely that our generation
will be better prepared than previous ones to appropriately handle issues of
religion and spirituality in the healthcare setting. America is a religiously
diverse nation, perhaps the most diverse in the world. Thus, as we continue
maturing into physicians, it is my sincere hope that we also continue to
develop sensitivity for beliefs and practices that may not be agreeable to our
own. I conclude that we will.
References
1. Sodestrom,
K. E. and I. M. Martinson (1987). "Patients' spiritual coping strategies:
a study of nurse and patient perspectives." Oncol Nurs Forum 14(2): 41-6.
2. Swenson,
C.H., S. Fuller and R. Clements (1993). “Stages of religious faith and reaction
to terminal cancer.” J Psychol Theology 21:238-45.
3. Harris, W.
S., M. Gowda and J. Kolb (1999). “A randomized, controlled trial of the effects
of remote, intercessory prayer on outcomes in patients admitted to the coronary
care unit.” Archives of Internal Medicine 159:2273-8.
4. Meraviglia,
M. (2006). "Effects of spirituality in breast cancer survivors." Oncol
Nurs Forum 33(1): E1-7.
5. Mayo Clinic
(2007). Mayo Clinic Book of Alternative Medicine. New York, NY, Time
Inc. Home Entertainment Books
6. Zaleski, P.
and C. Zaleski (2005). Prayer : a history. Boston, New York, Houghton
Mifflin Co.
7. Catholic
Church (1993). Catechism of the Catholic Church. Libreria Editrice Vaticana,
Citta del Vaticano.
8. Collins, M.
“Basic Doctrines: The Laying on of Hands.” http://bibletools.org/index.cfm/fuseaction/Library.sr/CT/BS/k/235.
December 1998. Retrieved January 16, 2008.
9. Holy Bible.
James 5:14,15. King James Version
10. Holy Bible.
Isaiah 38:2-8.
11. Praglin, L.
“Biblical and Early Rabbinic History of Healing.” http://www.myjewishlearning.com/lifecycle/Other_Life_Events/IllnessandHealing/EarlyHistoryHealing.htm.
Spring 1999. Retrieved December 20, 2007.
12. Sered, S.
“The Contemporary Jewish Healing Movement.” http://www.myjewishlearning.com/lifecycle/Other_Life_Events/IllnessandHealing/HealingMovement.htm.
January 2002. Retrieved December 20, 2007.
13. Moodley, R.
and W. West (2005). Integrating traditional healing practices into
counseling and psychotherapy. Sage Publications Inc.
14. Byrd, R. C.
(1988). "Positive therapeutic effects of intercessory prayer in a coronary
care unit population." South Med J 81(7): 826-9.
15. Ai, A. L.,
C. Peterson and S. F. Bolling (1997). “Psychological recovery from coronary
artery bypass graft surgery: the use of complementary therapies.” J Altern
Complement Med 3:343-53.
16. Meraviglia,
M. G. (2002). "Prayer in people with cancer." Cancer Nurs 25(4): 326-31.
17. Benson, H.,
J. A. Dusek, et al. (2006). "Study of the Therapeutic Effects of
Intercessory Prayer (STEP) in cardiac bypass patients: a multicenter randomized
trial of uncertainty and certainty of receiving intercessory prayer." Am
Heart J 151(4): 934-42.
18. Levin, J
(1996). “How prayer heals: a theoretical model.” Altern Ther (2):66-73.
19. Booth,
Craig. "Faith Healing -- God’s Compassion, God’s Power, and God’s
Sovereignty: Is a Christian permitted to seek medical assistance and to use
medicine?" http://thefaithfulword.org/faithhealing.html.
December 2003. Retrieved on January 12, 2008.
20. Ehman, J.
W., B. B. Ott, et al. (1999). "Do patients want physicians to inquire
about their spiritual or religious beliefs if they become gravely ill?" Arch
Intern Med 159(15): 1803-6.
21. Koenig HG,
McCullough ME, Larson DB. Handbook of Religion and Health. New York, NY: Oxford University Press;
2001.
22. Ibid.
23. www.jointcommission.org. Accessed
December 31, 2008.
24. Puchalski
CM, Larson DB. “Developing curricula in spirituality and medicine.” Acad Med. 1998;73:970-974.
COMMENTS
|
 |